Saturday, June 16, 2012

2012 NBA FINALS STATS: 'Ball Don't Lie' (Sheedisms revisited)

FROM 'OKIE' TO SOUTH BEACH










Leave it to 'Balky' Van Gundy to cite a highly recognized “Sheedism” during Game 2, i.e., Ball Don’t Lie”. 

This timeless Rasheed Wallace quip dovetails quite well into an additional 'truism' about stats & numbers.  

I'd argue, "Numbers don’t lie", either.

Incidentally, of all one-liners Sheed dropped, my personal favorite stands alone as: C-I-T

During turbulent stretch of Games in Portland,
w/Wallace's shooting % & scoring down; Wallace was asked if he was bothered by ever-increasing criticism:  

Not really. As long as they CUT-THE-CHECK on Friday's each week, I’m straight. C  - I -  T.  That’s my motto – always.”

(Wallace' ‘Both Teams Played Hard’, Press Conference was a masterpiece, also)

Honesty; often prefaced in differing ways.

Barkley was/is honest in mostly AMUSING ways.
Wallace - like him or abhor him - 
Was/is honest in mostly coldhearted ways.

Though I did respect Sheed's candid authenticity, &
Wallace illustrious 15-Year Career On-Court numbers Speak volumes about the guys' tireless, consistent & resourceful play.

Yet, Wallace didn’t do HIMSELF any favors w/press; 
Thus, it's truly difficult to feel too sorry for him.

Sheed either didn’t see &/or care how much he hurt himself by such comments.

Rasheed Wallace is clearly one of the most misunderstood people in the sports world.

Wallace did more for disadvantaged families (including his OWN), beyond that of the average person w/such resources - without most folks knowing a thing about it.

Lastly, the testimony about Sheed to throw in: 
A certain former Coach when interviewed by local talking heads the day Rasheed Wallace signed w/The Portland Trailblazers:

Rasheed Wallace was THE most Coachable Player I ever had at Carolina - Period" ~ DEAN SMITH

Digress – back to hoops
________

Slicing up numbers from Finals Games 1 & 2 
Many pertinent numbers rising to surface, FYI 
(as always, these may be redundant)

FACTS THAT MATTER

1st Qrtr makes all the Difference?

OKCLOSTJUST 2 of 8 FINALS QTRS; 
(THE 1ST QTR of EACH GAME)


MIA HAS WON 1ST QTRS BY COMBINED 17 PTS
OKC HAS WON 4TH QTRS BY COMBINED 17 PTS

AS WE MIGHT EXPECT FROM 1-1 SERIES, 
OKC & MIA STATS RAN 'TRUE-TO-FORM' THRU GM 2:

SIMILAR NUMBERS

POINTS-IN-PAINT
OKC: 88
MIA: 84

Paint Points:
Undoubtedly #1 Gm-to-Gm Swivel to Tie Series 
OKC DOMINATED Paint, Gm 1 (OKC 24 | MIA 4)
MIA flipped this, Gm 2 (MIA 44 | OKC 32)

FT RATE - SERIES 
(FT Att per FG Att)
OKC: 29.7
MIA: 29.7% 

3-POINT SHOTS MADE 
OKC: 14
MIA: 14

2ND QUARTER SCORES
2Q GAME 1: MIA 25 | OKC 25
2Q GAME 2: MIA 28 | OKC 28

TEMPO | PACE
Game 1: 89 Possessions
Game 2: 90 Possessions 

REBOUNDS
OKC: 79
MIA: 75

O-REBOUNDS
OKC: 20
MIA: 18

PERSONAL FOULS
MIA: 40
OKC: 38

STEALS 
OKC: 14
MIA: 11

ASSISTS 
OKC: 36
MIA: 33

TURNOVERS
OKC: 20
MIA: 23

SURPRISING STATS 


#1: TEAM FT% 
MIA 83.7%
OKC 73.6%

MIA FT: 36-43 
OKC FT: 39-53

MIA entered Finals shooting 72.3% 
(Good deal below MIA Regular Season Avg 77.5%)

OKC came into Finals shooting sparkling 84.4% FT’s
(Even higher than OKC’s #1 NBA Reg Avg 80.3%)

#2: DUNKS 
OKC: 10-11 
MIA: 8-8

MIA encapsulates this unusual category  
(Heat +18 Dunks Last 2 Series)

OKC’s +5 Dunks Game 1 (OKC 8 | MIA 3) 
Set early tone for Series

MIA coming back w/5 Gm 2 Dunks 
Equally noteworthy 

STATS THAT ARE NOT SO EVEN

BENCH PRODUCTION

AVERAGE BENCH MINUTES PLAYED/Gm
OKC: 62.5
MIA: 23.5
(Thunder +39 Minutes Played/Gm)

AVERAGE BENCH POINTS/Gm
OKC: 21 PPG
MIA: 10 PPG 
(Even w/Bosh off Bench in Game 1)

3-POINT ATTEMPTS
OKC: 43
MIA: 33

3-POINT PERCENTAGE
MIA: 42.4%
OKC: 32.6%

FAST-BREAK POINTS
OKC: 35
MIA: 14

POINTS OFF TURNOVERS
OKC: 30
MIA: 23
______

Gathering insight from many of these numbers
Back w/Gm 3 Play this evening on Graveyard Shift

All the best, guys 


W-O-W

Sunday, June 10, 2012

2012 NBA Finals 2 MIA at 2 OKC Preview I



Dropping in our initial Rd 1/2/3 complied numbers.


Also, working to summarize 
MIAMI & OKLAHOMA CITY's (+/-) Differential(s):

  • Shots at Rim 
  • Points-In-Paint 
  • Fast-Break Points
  • PACE | Tempo
  • Three-Point Shooting Proficiencies

Ect.  All part of forthcoming write-up(s)
FYI, as always


2012 NBA FINALS


2 MIAMI HEAT 12-6 | 11-7 ATS 
2 OKLAHOMA CITY THUNDER 12-3 | 11-4 ATS


OKLAHOMA CITY


Western Conf | Home Court Advantage
2-3-2 Finals Format


OKC 12-3 Overall Playoffs 
OKC 11-4 ATS | 11-4 O/U
OKC 4-0 S-U & ATS Run 
OKC 8-1 ATS & 11-2 ATS Run after 0-2 ATS Start


OKC WON WCF, 4-2 
(OKC Won 4 Straight vs 1 SAS after 0-2 Deficit)


OKC Defeated SAS, LAL & DAL
OKC 3 Playoff Series Victories came vs. Opponents’ 
That Won last 3 NBA Titles (DAL, LAL & SAS)


In fact, Thunder 3 Playoff Opponents 
Represented West in Finals LAST 13 SEASONS
(Winners of 10 of those 13 Finals)


2010-2011 DAL (Won) 
2009-2010 LAL (Won)
2008-2009 LAL (Won)
2007-2008 LAL (Lost)
2006-2007 SAS (Won)
2005-2006 DAL (Lost)
2004-2005 SAS (Won)
2003-2004 LAL (Lost)
2002-2003 SAS (Won)
2001-2002 LAL (Won)
2000-2001 LAL (Won)
1999-2000 LAL (Won)
1998-1999 SAS (Won)


2 OKC NOTABLE 2012 PLAYOFF STATS  


GOOD NUMBERS 


OKC #1 OFFENSIVE EFFICIENCY PLAYOFFS 1.126 O-PPP
OKC #1 PPG Scored 102.3 (Down from #2 Reg 103.1)
OKC #1 FT 83.5% (Up from #1 Reg 80.6%)
OKC #1 FT’s Made/Gm Playoffs 20.6 
OKC #1 Turnover Differential -2.8/Gm   
OKC #1 FRONTCOURT EFF-DIF PLAYOFFS +11.8
OKC #1 Frontcourt FG% Playoffs 51.6%
OKC #1 Backcourt Assist/Turnover Ratio 2.43
OKC #1 Backcourt Rebounds/Gm Playoffs 26.1
OKC #1 Bench FT’s Made/Gm Playoffs 7.1
OKC #2 T-Ov 11.5/Gm (Up from DEAD-LAST Reg 16.35)
OKC #2 Playoff Point Differential +6.6
OKC #2 Efficiency Differential Playoffs +.073 PPP
OKC #2 FG 47% (47.1% Reg)
OKC #2 eFG Differential Playoffs +3.0%
OKC #2 eFG Playoffs 51.2% 
OKC #2 FT Attempts/Gm 24.7 Playoffs
OKC #3 PACE | PLAYOFFS 91 Possessions/Gm
OKC #3 3-Pt Percentage 37.4% (Up from #11 Reg 35.8%)


WEAK NUMBERS 


OKC #9 DEFENSIVE EFFICIENCY PLAYOFFS 1.053 D-PPP
OKC #9 O-Rebound Percentage 25.1%
OKC #10 PPG Allowed 95.7 (Up from #17 Reg 96.9)
OKC #11 eFG Playoffs Defense Allowed 48.2%
OKC #11 O-Rebound Percentage Allowed 22.3% 
OKC #13 3-Pt ‘D’ 37% (Down from #8 Reg 34.2%) 
OKC #13 3-Pt Dif -1.4/Gm (Down from #9 Reg +1.3)
OKC #13 FT Rate Allowed 25.3%
OKC #16 O-Reb Percentage Differential -2.8%


MIAMI HEAT


Eastern Conference | Road Team
2-3-2 Finals Format


MIAMI 12-6 Overall Playoffs
MIA 11-7 ATS | 10-8 O/U
MIA 2-4 ATS Last 6, after 9-3 ATS Start


MIA WON ECF 4-3 over 4 BOS
(MIA Won 2 Straight vs 4 BOS after 2-3 Series Deficit)




2 MIAMI NOTABLE 2012 PLAYOFF STATS  


GOOD NUMBERS 


MIA #1 Playoff Point Differential +7.7
MIA #1 EFFICIENCY DIFF PLAYOFFS +.092 PPP
MIA #1 Backcourt Blocks/Gm Playoffs 1.9
MIA #1 3-Pt At Playoffs 19.67 (Up from #23 Reg 15.6) 
MIA #1 PPG Scored 102.3 (Down from #2 Reg 103.1)
MIA #1 FT At/Gm 27.83 Playoffs (Up from #8 Reg 24.2)
MIA #1 eFG Differential Playoffs +4.3% 
MIA #2 3-Pt FG Md Playoffs 7.67 (Up from #20 Reg 5.6) 
MIA #2 FT Md/Gm Playoffs 20.1 (Up from #8 Reg 18.76) 
MIA #2 FT Rate Differential Playoffs +3.5
MIA #2 eFG Allowed Playoffs 45.8%
MIA #2 Turnovers Forced/Gm Playoffs 14.7 
MIA #2 Turnover Differential -1.7/Gm   
MIA #3 OFFENSIVE EFFICIENCY PLAYOFFS 1.057 O-PPP 
MIA #3 DEFENSIVE EFFICIENCY PLAYOFFS 0.965 D-PPP
MIA #3 FG Playoffs 46% (Down from 47% Reg)
MIA #3 eFG Playoffs 50.1% 
MIA #3 FT-Rate Playoffs 25.8%
MIA #4 PPG Alwd 88.1 (Improved -4.4 from #4 Reg 92.5)


WEAK NUMBERS


MIA #10 FT 72.3% (Down from #7 Reg 77.5%) 
MIA #10 FT Rate Allowed 23%
MIA #12 O-Reb Percentage Allowed 26.5% 
MIA #14 PACE | PLAYOFFS 87.6 Possessions/Gm
MIA #15 Starter Minutes Playoff Average  


[1] POINT GUARD


OKC 6-3 | 187 WESTBROOK (#3 PER PG | 23 yrs)


37:07 Min (#10 Playoffs) +1:41 Min from 35:40 Reg
21.7 PPG Playoffs (#7 Playoffs) -1.9 Pts from Reg
43.6% FG% | Down from 45.7% Reg 
35% Three Pt Percentage | Up from 31.8% Reg
5.6 Ast/Gm (#2 Playoffs) Slightly Up from 5.5 Reg
2.3 Playoffs T-Overs/Gm | Improved from 3.6/Gm


#2 Thunder PPG Scorer | Playoffs & Reg
#2 Playoffs FG Attempts/Gm Playoffs 19.2
#6 Playoffs ‘Usage’ 30% 
#6 Playoffs FT Made/Gm 4.1
#7 Playoffs PPG 21.7
#8 Playoffs Steal% 1.7


MIA 6-1 | 191 CHALMERS (#43 PG PER* | 25 yrs)


39:06 Min (#6 Playoffs) Up +7:08 from 28:30 Reg
11.7 PPG Playoffs | Up +1.9 Pts from Reg
43.4% FG% | Down from 44.8% Reg 
36.4% Three Pt Shooting | Down from 38.8% Reg
3.8 Asst/Gm (#5 Playoffs) Down from 3.5 Reg 
#2 Playoffs Threes Made/Gm 1.67
1.8 T-Overs/Gm | Improved from 2.2/Gm


[2] SHOOTING GUARD 


OKC 6-5 | 219 SEFOLOSHA (#57 SF PER* | 27 yrs) 


21:20 Min | Down -0:30 Min/Gm from Reg
5.5 PPG Playoffs | Up +0.7 Pts from Reg
44% FG% | Up from 43.2% Reg 
36.8% Three Pt % | Down from 43.7% Reg
1.4 Asst/Gm | Up form 1.1 Reg
2.9 Reb/Gm Playoffs
0.5 Turnovers/Gm | Improved from 1.0/Gm Reg


MIA 6-4 | 214 WADE (#1 SG PER* | 30 yrs) 


39:07 Min (#5 Playoffs) Up +5.6 from 33.2 Reg
22.9 PPG (#6 Playoffs) +0.8 Pts from Reg
47% FG% | Down from 49.7% Reg 
70.3% FT | Down from 79.1% from Reg
8.2 FT Attempts/Gm (#2 Playoffs)
5 FT Made/Gm (#5 Playoffs)
29.6% 3-Pointers | Up from 26.8% Reg
4 Ast/Gm (#4 Playoffs) Down -0.6 from Reg
4.9 Reb/Gm Playoffs | Up +0.1/Gm from Reg
3.6 T-Overs/Gm (#2 Playoffs) Up from 2.6/Gm Reg
1.33 Blocks (#3 Playoffs)


#5 Playoffs ‘Usage’ 30.2%
#7 Playoffs Steal% 1.8
#10 Playoffs ‘Player Efficiency Rating 22.5


[3] SMALL FORWARD


OKC 6-9 | 213 DURANT (#2 PF PER* | 23 yrs) 


41.6 Min (#4 Playoffs) Up +3.1 Min/Gm from Reg
27.8 PPG (#3 Playoffs) Down -0.2 Pts from Reg
50.5% FG% | Up from 49.6% Reg
62.6% True FG (#2 Playoffs) 
36.4% Three Pt % | Down from 38.7% Reg
1.88 Three Pt FG Made/Gm (#1 Playoffs)
4.2 Asst/Gm | Up from 3.5 Reg
8 Reb/Gm Playoffs & Reg
2.9 Turnovers/Gm | Improved from 3.8/Gm


#1 Thunder PPG Scorer | Playoffs & Reg
#2 Playoffs Player Efficiency Rating 28.1
#2 Playoffs FG Made/Gm 9.4
#3 NBA PPG Scorer Playoffs


MIA 6-8 | 252 JAMES (#1 NBA PER* | 27 yrs) 


42:26 Min (#3 Playoffs) Up from 37:30 Reg
30.8 PPG | Up +3.7 Pts from Reg
51.2% FG% | Down from 53.1% Reg 
28.1% 3-Pt Playoffs | Down from 36.2% Reg
72% FT Playoffs | Down from 77% Reg
5.3 Ast/Gm | Down -0.9/Gm from 6.2 Reg
9.5 Reb/Gm Playoffs | Up +1.6 from Reg


JAMES: 2012 NBA MOST VALUABLE PLAYER


JAMES: #1 Playoffs in the following Stats
#1 NBA PPG Scorer Playoffs & Reg
#1 Heat PPG Scorer Playoffs & Reg
#1 Playoffs PPG 30.8
#1 Playoffs FG’s Made/Gm 11.1
#1 Playoffs FG Attempts/Gm 21.9
#1 Playoffs Turnovers/Gm 4.13
#1 Playoffs Assists/Gm 6.1
#1 Playoffs O-Rebounds/Gm 2.44
#1 Playoffs FT Attempts/Gm 10.44
#1 Playoffs FT Made/Gm 7.5
#1 Playoffs Personal Efficiency Rating 31.2
#1 Playoffs Offensive Win Share 3.4


[4] POWER FORWARD 


OKC 6-10 | 222 IBAKA (#18 PF PER* | 22 yrs) 


29.3 Min Playoffs | Up +2.2 Min/Gm from Reg
10.7 PPG Playoffs | Up +1.6 Pts from Reg
55.6% FG% (#6 Playoffs) Up from 53.5% Reg 
76% FT Playoffs | Up from 66.1% Reg
5.9 Reb/Gm Playoffs | Down -1.6 from Reg
0.7 Turnovers/Gm | Improved from 1.2/Gm Reg
3.3 Blks/Gm (#1 Playoffs) Down -0.4 from 3.7 Reg
1.5 O-Reb/Gm (#2 Playoffs) 
#6 Playoffs ‘O-Efficiency Rating’ 1.229 O-PPP
#7 Playoffs Turnover Rating 6.8 Per Possession


MIA 6-8 | 227 BATTIER (#53 PF PER* | 33 yrs) 


37.1 Min (#7 Playoffs) Up from 35.4 Reg
5.7 PPG Playoffs | -0.2 Pts from Reg
43.6% FG% | Down from 45.7% Reg 
35% Three Pt % | Up from 31.8 Reg
5.1 Three Pt FG Attempts (#4 Playoffs) 


[5] POST


OKC 6-10 | 283 PERKINS (#58 PF PER* | 27 yrs) 


26.8 Min Playoffs | Same as Reg
4.7 PPG Playoffs | Down -0.4 Pts from Reg
41.2% FG | Down from 49% Reg 
82.4% FT | Up from 65.2% Reg
6 Reb | Down -0.6 from Reg 
1.47 Blocks (#2 Playoffs) Up +0.43 from Reg


MIA 6-9 | 213 BOSH (#20 POST PER* | 27 yrs) 


28.1 Mn Playoffs | Down -7.0 Mn from 35.1 Reg
13.0 PPG Playoffs | Down -5.0 Pts from Reg
48.7% FG Playoffs & Reg
80% FT | Down from 82.1% Reg
0.9 Asst/Gm | Down Up from 1.8 Reg
62.5% Three Pt FG% (#1 Playoffs)
1.6 T-Overs/Gm | Improved from 2.1/Gm


#3 Heat PPG Scorer Playoffs & Reg
Bosh missed 9 of 17 MIA Playoff Gms (53%) 
Bosh missed 11 of 17 MIA Playoff Starts (64.7%)
(Abdominal Injury | Gm 1 v IND, Rd 2) 
YET BOSH is #5 NBA Playoffs ‘Usage’ 20.8%


[1|2|3] BENCH | BACKCOURT


OKC 6-5 | 221 Harden (#4 SG PER* | 22 Yrs)


17.6 PPG Playoffs | Up +0.8 Pts from Reg
31.1 Min Playoffs | Down -0.3 Mn from Reg
45.2% FG Playoffs | Down from 49.1% Reg
44.6 Three Pt % | Up from 39% Reg
87.3% FT | Up from 84.6% Reg
6 Made FT's/Gm Playoffs | Up +1 from Reg
1.7 Stls/Gm Playoffs | Up +0.7 from Reg
5.2 Reb/Gm Playoffs | Up +0.9 from Reg 


HARDEN (Despite coming off OKC BENCH) RANK:
#2 Playoffs True Shooting 62.5%
#3 Playoffs Offensive Win Share 1.9
#4 Playoffs FT Attempts/Gm 6.8
#4 Playoffs FT’s Made/Gm 6.0
#4 Playoffs Three Pt Percentage 44.6%
#4 Playoffs Personal Efficiency Rating 23.7
#4 Playoffs ‘Usage’ 23.6%
#7 Playoffs Offensive Rating 1.226
#9 Playoffs Steal% 1.7


[4|5] BENCH | BIGS


OKC 6-9 | 258 Collison (#65 PF PER* | 31 yrs)


16.5 Min Playoffs | Down -5.3 Min from 20.8 Reg
3.4 PPG Playoffs | Down -1.1 Pts from Reg
2.9 Reb Playoffs | Down -1.4 Reb/Gm from Reg 


#1 Playoffs FG 66.7% (Up from 59.7% Reg)




MIA 6-8 | 230 Haslem (#72 PF/POST PER* | 31 Yrs)


21.8 Min Playoffs | Down 3.2 from 25 Reg
5.5 PPG | Down -0.5 from Reg
#8 Playoffs 1.6 O-Reb/Gm 1.6
___________


Breaking down predetermined numbers from Rds 1-3 
Such as:
  • Paint & Fast Break Points
  • Unit-to-Unit Matchups
  • Frontcourt vs. Backcourt
  • Pace/Tempo Differences 
  • Defensive Schemes 


Ect, in the upcoming write-up 
We’ll drop it in here (always found in the blog)




All the best, guys 



W-O-W

Followers